The Most Important Elements Of Future Cancer Research
Матеріал з Луцький НВК "Гімназія №14"
Cancer Fund raising programs helps the organizations to continue the research process until an advance treatment, prevention and an ultimate cure may be obtained. The Council organizes special events like Concert for a Cause and lots of more to help with ongoing research. The idea is fun and people may have more knowledge on the way to prevent this disease. Fund raising events raise millions of dollars to sustain the operation and research cost.
There are numerous ways that one can help to raise more funds. Car donations are a highly effective and fast way to raise funds. The car donation program offers you a hassle free donation program.
Research Fundraising programs helps the organizations to continue the research process until an advance treatment, prevention and an ultimate cure can be obtained. The Council organizes special occasions like Concert for a Cause and several more. The idea is fun and people may have more knowledge on how to prevent cancer. Fundraising events raise millions of dollars to sustain the operation and research cost. There are numerous ways that one can help to raise more funds. Car donations are a highly effective and fast way to raise funds. The car donation program offers you a hassle free donation program. cancer treatment Research Fundraising includes Marathon-For-A-Cause. 80% of the proceeds will go to Cancer Research. Magazines and booklets are usually a division of the fundraising program.
As the usage of parachutes is often restricted to purely volunteer activities, as with posting the colors by dropping from the sky onto the area related to an athletic event, you can find far more serious applications that beg to be addressed. For decades, brave paratroopers have been mandated to risk their lives by utilizing these unproven devices. One interesting result is the fact that commercial airlines have refused to issue parachutes to their passengers and then for good reason. One aviation expert, speaking on condition of anonymity, has stated flat out that his company will not assume the liability inherent in recommending the usage of such untested devices for passengers.
There is obviously an immediate and urgent need to correct this deficiency inside this major field of human endeavor. The perception that parachutes are of value is based strictly on anecdotal evidence. It's a universally accepted axiom that evidence based conclusions, not supported by randomized clinical trials is sorely wanting. It will not seem at all unreasonable to proceed immediately to correct this sore deficiency which is so pervasive throughout the aviation industry.
An effective clinical trial that could put this controversy to rest immediately doesn't appear to be beyond the bounds of reason and practicality. Roughly speaking, it could be completed from a readily available test vehicle for example the old reliable C-130 aircraft. This craft has proven a workhorse around the world and it is credentials are impeccable. The whole sequence of events relating to the trial might be executed in a matter of minutes, seconds should the need be. It need only involve a range of test subjects (patients, if need be to keep the terminology continuous), say 100, each of which would wear a parachute and jump out at the signal of the principal investigator (jump master in the vernacular). It should be noted that a certain number of these candidates would be wearing normal parachutes while a particular number, say 5 one example is would be wearing what appeared by all accounts to be normal parachutes but would, in fact, be packed with ordinary bed sheets. Neither the jumper, the jump master nor the airplane pilot would know which were the dummy packs. For the moment it is not essential to prescribe just what this number will be. This is better left to a committee of mathematicians from the national Cancer Institute to find out what range of "paracebos" would give the most conclusive data.
The opportunity for excellence in data reduction is manifold. One example is beyond the mere morbidity statistics, we could envision varying degrees of injury, as well as predict survival estimates for all those who did not suffer the inconvenience of death at impact with the earth. This might effortlessly provide gainful employment for hundreds of research technicians. Of course there would be necessary and proper expenses. Surely the pilot and co-pilot should be rewarded handsomely for their participation, and undoubtedly the principal investigator (jump master). Perhaps the biggest expense of all would be the media blitz to recruit volunteers. It is to be expected that intense pressure must be exerted to raise awareness on the necessity for such testing and finally get these brave heroes to volunteer. An effective call to their obligation to fellow air travelers world wide and their role as courageous scientists in a brave new venture should be sufficient. As a note on expenses, it must not be necessary to pay these brave souls anything as their participation in such a noble cause should, itself, be reward enough. Of course, they did get a no cost ride on the airplane with complimentary light refreshments, free use of the parachute, free instruction from the jump master and a remarkable descent to Mother Earth. What more could a reasonable participant ask? Financial support should be easily forthcoming from the likes of Boeing, Lockheed and also the commercial airlines who stand to benefit significantly from the end result.
