The Low Down On Cancer Research Scientists Exposed

Матеріал з Луцький НВК "Гімназія №14"

"Fight cancer", "Beat cancer" are very popular expressions right now, and it is good so. Although October, the Cancer of the breast Awareness Month is over, for various still see many individuals wearing pink ribbons on their own jackets, which is a demonstration of their will to help those women who have problems with this disease. And this is extremely much appreciated and should be acknowledged. Fundraising and information events, sites, donations, merchandise, ads all around the media, groups on social networking sites, individuals spreading the word - attention is certainly given to the subject and significant amount of money is collected.

Conversely, looking just a little bit closer, as a cancer survivor myself who studied the topic from the most various resources accessible for public, I personally have some questions, doubts and reservations about these research programs and might be a bad person, but I did not donate one single cent and not intend to do so. Tell you why.

Fight. An integral word when discussing cancer.

How do you best fight in order that you win? You know your enemy.

A problem - any problem - can be only handled if one knows the exact cause of it. This certainly will be clear - how else do you solve a situation, if you don't determine what is it exactly?

Let's take breast cancer, it looks like this: every year $ millions are spent to discover the causes of cancer And many more importantly, develop new treatments. Let me suggest: treatments can be only effective once they target the root of the problem... "The exact causes of cancer of the breast are not known." In reality, as outlined by the publicly available statements, causes of cancer are a mystery for the health sector.

The theory of changed or Highly recommended Webpage damaged genes is wide spread, and an information video on the Medical News Today site gives just a little hint on why does it occur: "Damage or change in the genetic material of cells by environmental of internal factors sometimes results in cells that don't die and continue to multiply until an enormous cancer cell or tumor develops."

Excellent. The next phase would be then to investigate these environmental or internal factors that damage or change the genetic material of cells, would not it?

The environmental factors are essentially known for the scientists and then for the public: bad nutrition, tobacco, certain chemicals that we use, etc. Cancer research should go then within the direction of eliminating these factors: educating the people on correct eating habits, cutting back the use of harmful chemicals, and so forth. And cancer treatment would primarily consist of targeting the cause of cancer, the main reason why those genes got changed or damaged: increasing certain vitamins as well as other nutrition supplements, cleansing and physical exercise that can help the body push out the accumulated toxins, boosting the own self defense of the body, the immune system and so forth.

But this is not how it goes. Cancer researches deal mostly with developing the conventional therapies by official medicine: new drugs, radiation, hormones and surgery. And cancer treatments accessible in hospitals are mainly about giving chemotherapy and such to the patients. Can anyone see how adding extra chemicals into the already overwhelmed and weakened system would help the human body to recover? Since it will not.