Cancer Research Scientists Expertise
Матеріал з Луцький НВК "Гімназія №14"
"Fight cancer", "Beat cancer" are extremely popular expressions currently, and it's good so. Although October, the Breast cancer Awareness Month is over, you can still see a lot of men and women wearing pink ribbons on their jackets, which is a demonstration of their will to help those women who have problems with this disease. And this is quite much appreciated and should be acknowledged. Fundraising and information events, sites, donations, merchandise, advertisements all around the media, groups on social networking sites, individuals spreading the phrase - attention is obviously given to the topic and significant amount of money is collected.
On the contrary, looking a little bit closer, as a cancer survivor myself who studied the topic from the most various resources available for public, I personally have some questions, doubts and reservations about these research programs and might be a bad person, but I did not donate one single cent and not intend to do so. Tell you why.
Fight. A vital word when talking about cancer.
How do you best fight to ensure that you win? You know your enemy.
A problem - any problem - can be only handled if one knows the exact cause of it. This will be clear - how else do you solve a situation, should you not determine what is it exactly?
Let's take cancer of the breast, it looks like this: on a yearly basis $ millions are spent to discover click through the following website page causes of cancer And a lot more importantly, develop new treatments. Let me suggest: treatments can be only effective when they target the root of the problem... "The exact causes of breast cancer are not known." Actually, in accordance with the publicly available statements, causes of cancer are a mystery for the health care industry.
The theory of changed or damaged genes is wide spread, and an information video on the Medical News Today site gives just a little hint on why does it occur: "Damage or change within the genetic material of cells by environmental of internal factors sometimes results in cells that do not die and continue to multiply until a huge cancer cell or tumor develops."
Excellent. The next phase would be then to investigate these environmental or internal factors that damage or change the genetic material of cells, wouldn't it?
The environmental factors are essentially noted for the scientists as well as for the general public: bad nutrition, tobacco, certain chemicals that we use, etc. Cancer research should go then within the direction of eliminating these factors: educating the people on correct eating habits, cutting back the utilization of harmful chemicals, and so forth. And cancer treatment would primarily consist of targeting the cause of cancer, the rationale why those genes got changed or damaged: increasing certain vitamins as well as other nutrition supplements, cleansing and physical exercise that helps one's body push out the accumulated toxins, boosting the own self defense of the body, the immune system and so forth.
But this isn't how it goes. Cancer researches deal mostly with developing the standard therapies by official medicine: new drugs, radiation, hormones and surgery. And cancer treatments available in hospitals are mainly about giving chemotherapy and such to the patients. Can anyone see how adding extra chemicals into the already overwhelmed and weakened system would help the human body to recover? Because it will not.
